Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.8.3/V2.0) id KAA08004; Thu, 12 Dec 1996 10:48:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.bellglobal.com by taz.hyperreal.com (8.8.3/V2.0) with ESMTP id KAA07992; Thu, 12 Dec 1996 10:48:46 -0800 (PST) From: rasmus@mail1.bellglobal.com Received: from inet-dev ([199.243.250.207]) by mail1.bellglobal.com (Netscape Mail Server v2.02) with SMTP id AAA22088 for ; Thu, 12 Dec 1996 13:47:37 -0500 Date: Thu, 12 Dec 1996 13:49:30 -0500 (EST) Reply-To: rasmus@mail1.bellglobal.com Subject: Re: WWW Form Bug Report: "mod_proxy chokes on netscape "shortcut" URLs" on Solaris 2.x (fwd) To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com In-Reply-To: <199612121721.MAA11776@spudboy.telebase.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com > Hey, Rasmus, did we decide after all that folderol to put your patch into > the contrib directory, and deal with this after 1.2 was out? If it's not > there, let's put it there and I'll put a section in the proxy docs for > stuff like this. Yes, I think we came to the conclusion that it was best suited for the contrib dir. I wanted to modify it to make it configurable, but if it is in the contrib dir, is this necessary? If someone goes to the trouble of fetching it from there and compiling it in, chances are they want the functionality. If so, the patch is fine as it is. The patch is on my home machine. I'll upload it tonight when I get home or if someone has it from the mailing list, just stick it in. -Rasmus