Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.8.3/V2.0) id IAA00986; Tue, 3 Dec 1996 08:15:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from battra.telebase.com by taz.hyperreal.com (8.8.3/V2.0) with ESMTP id IAA00978; Tue, 3 Dec 1996 08:15:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from wormhole.telebase.com by battra.telebase.com id LAA00970 for ; Tue, 3 Dec 1996 11:10:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from spudboy.telebase.com (spudboy.telebase.com [172.16.2.215]) by wormhole.telebase.com (8.8.3/8.8.1) with ESMTP id LAA11866 for ; Tue, 3 Dec 1996 11:10:15 -0500 (EST) Received: (from chuck@localhost) by spudboy.telebase.com (8.8.1/8.8.1) id LAA02113 for new-httpd@hyperreal.com; Tue, 3 Dec 1996 11:10:15 -0500 (EST) From: Chuck Murcko Message-Id: <199612031610.LAA02113@spudboy.telebase.com> Subject: Re: Apache 1.2b1 patches for QNX 4.23, Watcom 10.6 (fwd) To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com Date: Tue, 3 Dec 1996 11:10:15 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <199612031542.JAA29466@sierra.zyzzyva.com> from "Randy Terbush" at Dec 3, 96 09:42:28 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com Yup. +1. Randy Terbush liltingly intones: > > > Yow! How did we miss that http_protocol patch? > > These diffs look good. What people can quickly give me a couple +1s? > > > > not acked. > > > > > > ----- Forwarded message from colin@econz.co.nz ----- > > > > From: colin@econz.co.nz > > Message-Id: <199612031347.CAA14393@voodoo.econz.co.nz> > > Subject: Apache 1.2b1 patches for QNX 4.23, Watcom 10.6 > > To: apache-bugs@apache.org > > Date: Wed, 4 Dec 1996 02:47:14 +1300 (nzdt) > > X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25] > > Content-Type: text > > > > Hi there, > > > > I just downloaded and compiled the 1.2b1 release, which so far seems to > > be working well, although admittedly I haven't thrashed it very hard yet. > > > > Anyway, while compiling it, I had to make a few minor changes to: > > > > src/Configure - QNX defines etc. > > src/conf.h - QNX defines, includes etc. > > > > src/http_protocol.c - found a possible bug, assignment in boolean expression? > > > > On line 219 there you assign r->chunked to 1 in a boolean expression, which > > doesn't look quite right. > > > > However I've met people who like using && and || to replace if statements, > > so could you please let me know whether this last one really is a bug > > or not? > > > > BTW - do you know which browsers support HTTP/1.1? > > > > Please find patches generated by diff -c of the three files. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Colin > > > > ... > > > > ----- End of forwarded message from colin@econz.co.nz ----- > > > chuck Chuck Murcko N2K Inc. Wayne PA chuck@telebase.com And now, on a lighter note: If you had any brains, you'd be dangerous.