httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Paul Richards <>
Subject Re: Dec 1st
Date Mon, 02 Dec 1996 09:56:35 GMT
Alexei Kosut <> writes:

> For the most part, yeah. I think it's important for little releases,
> though. If a user has 1.2.0, and is deciding whether or not to upgrade
> to 1.2.1, they might want to know exactly what source-level changes
> have been made.

Any change info that is actually documented, as opposed to being
available in cvs, should be in the actual documentation i.e. /manual.

That's my feeling about it anyway. The docs should be updated for
minor releases as well as major ones.

  Paul Richards. Originative Solutions Ltd.  (Netcraft Ltd. contractor)
  Elsevier Science TIS online journal project.
  Phone: 0370 462071 (Mobile), +44 (0)1865 843155

View raw message