Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.8.3/V2.0) id VAA14670;
 Sat, 30 Nov 1996 21:27:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sierra.zyzzyva.com by taz.hyperreal.com (8.8.3/V2.0) with ESMTP
 id VAA14663; Sat, 30 Nov 1996 21:27:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sierra.zyzzyva.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
 sierra.zyzzyva.com (8.8.2/8.8.2) with ESMTP id XAA07661 for
 <new-httpd@hyperreal.com>; Sat, 30 Nov 1996 23:27:31 -0600 (CST)
Message-Id: <199612010527.XAA07661@sierra.zyzzyva.com>
To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com
Subject: Re: vote faster 
In-reply-to: fielding's message of Sat, 30 Nov 1996 21:17:05 -0800.
         <9611302117.aa29611@paris.ics.uci.edu>
X-uri: http://www.zyzzyva.com/
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 1996 23:27:30 -0600
From: Randy Terbush <randy@zyzzyva.com>
Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com

> I really object to sending out public releases (even betas) when
> we have the fixes in hand for known bugs and all that's needed in
> two more +1 votes to apply the changes (or -1 to remove them from
> consideration).  If we can't do that, then we also can't be doing
> enough peer review for a public release.
> 
> We are not Microsoft or Netscape; it is in our best interest not to
> behave like them.
> 
> ....Roy

I agree completely. What's outstanding?  I'm still catching up from
a disk crash.