Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.7.6/V2.0) id JAA22520; Fri, 1 Nov 1996 09:58:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from blacklodge.c2.net by taz.hyperreal.com (8.7.6/V2.0) with ESMTP id JAA22506; Fri, 1 Nov 1996 09:58:31 -0800 (PST) Received: (from sameer@localhost) by blacklodge.c2.net (8.7.6/8.7.3) id JAA11752; Fri, 1 Nov 1996 09:59:43 -0800 (PST) From: sameer Message-Id: <199611011759.JAA11752@blacklodge.c2.net> Subject: Re: mod_pics_simple To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com Date: Fri, 1 Nov 1996 09:59:43 -0800 (PST) Cc: new-httpd@hyperreal.com In-Reply-To: <199611010518.AA13015@mta4.nts.uci.edu> from "Roy T. Fielding" at "Oct 31, 96 09:17:35 pm" X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL22 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-new-httpd@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com > Hmmmm, all opinion of PICS aside, the right way to implement it is > as a general directive for > > Header set PICS-Label ... > > which is what I thought we got with Paul S's patches. Ooooops, did those > ever get committed? > > That would eliminate any concern about Apache "officially" supporting PICS. > yeah, that's the way to go. I am hoping that paul's patches were committed. -- Sameer Parekh Voice: 510-986-8770 C2Net FAX: 510-986-8777 The Internet Privacy Provider http://www.c2.net/ sameer@c2.net