Roy> Argh! It was bad enough having one unnecessary module name
Roy> structure, but now we seem to have two (in addition to the actual
Roy> module name which is the filename in the module list). Would
Roy> anyone mind if I replaced the existing module_names[] indices
Roy> with a simple traversal of the module list?
The module name really should be put into the module structure itself.
As it is, modules loaded via mod_dld cannot have an associated name.
I believe this breaks mod_info, at least.
Tom
--
tromey@cygnus.com Member, League for Programming Freedom
|