To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com
Subject: Re: cvs commit: apache/src http_protocol.c http_request.c
         http_request.h           httpd.h util.c util_script.c util_script.h
References: <199610202045.NAA05728@taz.hyperreal.com>
From: Paul Richards <p.richards@elsevier.co.uk>
Date: 22 Oct 1996 10:20:05 +0100
In-Reply-To: Ben Laurie's message of Sun, 20 Oct 1996 13:45:57 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <57ohhvl5iy.fsf@tees.elsevier.co.uk>
Lines: 32
Sender: owner-new-httpd@apache.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com

Ben Laurie <ben@hyperreal.com> writes:

> ben         96/10/20 13:45:56
> 
>   Modified:    src       http_protocol.c http_request.c http_request.h
>                         httpd.h util.c  util_script.c util_script.h
>   Log:
>   Even more constification.
>   

Is there any concensus on release plans? All this cleaning up may seem
inocuous but I wouldn't do it close to a release. You never know where
there's some unexpected side effect of some variable not being
constant and while we really want to eliminate such nasties now is
probably not the time to be doing it.

Either we are about to release, in which case, freeze the tree and get
the thing out, or we're not, in which case Roy can get on with
cleaning up the code.

My view is that we should freeze now, branch the repository, get all
the oustanding code from personal projects in and start cleaning up
from there.

As far as I know there's only the threaded server and the NT port in
personal repositories, can we get these into cvs now?

-- 
  Paul Richards. Originative Solutions Ltd.  (Netcraft Ltd. contractor)
  Elsevier Science TIS online journal project.
  Email: p.richards@elsevier.co.uk
  Phone: 0370 462071 (Mobile), +44 (0)1865 843155