From: Jim Jagielski <jim@jaguNET.com>
Message-Id: <199610141231.IAA26341@shado.jaguNET.com>
Subject: Re: WWW Form Bug Report: "Hard-coded 150 connection limit not
 documented " on FreeBSD (fwd)
To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 1996 08:31:21 -0400 (EDT)
In-Reply-To: <9610140956.aa03127@gonzo.ben.algroup.co.uk> from "Ben Laurie" at
 Oct 14, 96 09:56:54 am
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-new-httpd@apache.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com

Ben Laurie wrote:
> 
> Rob Hartill wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > This has become a frequent complaint/request.
> 
> I haven't quite understood why this limit is hard? Is there any reason not to
> make it soft?
> 

I haven't looked too closely at it... I'm guessing that it's only on
the file-version of the scoreboard that it would be a concern doing
a "on-the-fly" malloc of the space, and even then it's a simple matter
of when it's done...
-- 
Jim Jagielski  << jim@jaguNET.com >>   |   "If we took the bones out
  **  jaguNET Access Services  **      |    it wouldn't be crunchy"
      Email: info@jaguNET.com          |            Whizzo Crunchy Frog
++    http://www.jaguNET.com/         +++      Voice/Fax: 410-931-3157       ++