httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Brian Behlendorf <br...@organic.com>
Subject Re: Perhaps a bug? (fwd)
Date Thu, 03 Oct 1996 22:27:08 GMT

Hmm, I'd presume name-vhosts could work with inetd, but I'd doubt if IP-based
vhosts do, since inetd is the one handling connecting to the socket and I don't
think it passes on that information to the server.  Anyone know?

I have no problem dropping support for inetd, even in 1.2, by the way.

	Brian

On Thu, 3 Oct 1996, Rob Hartill wrote:
> Not acked.
> 
> Do virtual hosts work with inetd ?  sounds like a recipe for disaster.
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Forwarded message from Jose Luis Carretero Garcia -----
> 
> Date: Thu, 3 Oct 1996 20:23:46 GMT
> Message-Id: <199610032023.UAA25476@pizarro.unex.es>
> X-Sender: billy@pizarro.unex.es
> X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.2
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> To: apache-bugs@mail.apache.org
> From: Jose Luis Carretero Garcia <billy@unex.es>
> Subject: Perhaps a bug?
> 
> 
>         Dear Sirs:
> 
>         I've got my binary copy of your Apache v1.1.1 httpd server. After a
> successuful instalation (with correct responses to my principal www server),
> I tried to configure the httpd server for VirtualHosting support. I've tried
> in many ways, looking your documentation and advises, without fast success.
> My OS is Solaris 2.5.1, running in a Sparc IPC with 24 MB of memory and 1 GB
> of hard disk. I've got one qualified dns server name too, and I wanted to
> include a response for a new known IP address.
> 
>         - First time, I tried to use your new feature of virtualhosting,
> letting access         to two different IP addresses without taking care of
> multiIP interfaces. Doesn't         work.
> 
>         - Second time, I openen the inetd new http channel, and configure
> your server as         inet type. I opened too, the second le0 interface
> with the new IP address. When         I uncommented the Virtual hosting
> section (sure correctly configured and after          rebooting the system),
> server went down and produced our friendly core file.
> 
>         - Third time, I tried with the multi daemons option. With my port 80
> service, 
>         and my recently created http channel in inetd.conf, the server still
> created the         core file. Of course, I had two different copies of your
> server in my hd,         running into separate inet channels.
> 
>         - Fourth time, I tried with different port's numbers. And it worked,
> but merging         data from one to another service.
> 
>         - At last, I've the server working in the two interfaces with the
> multidaemons          option, and standalone option for two of them. With
> different BindAddress               directives.
> 
>         So, finally, I think that VirtualHosting, in Solaris 2.5.x and using
> inetd server types, doesn't work correctly. Perhaps I unknown something that
> I must known, but here is my report, for you to take in mind. 
> 
>         Best regards, I hope you go on with your good work,
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>                                                 Jose Luis Carretero Garcia
>                                                 Center of Remote Sensing and GIS
>                                                 Dp. of Geography & Regional
> Planning
>                                                 UNIVERSITY OF EXTREMADURA
>         
> 
>         
> 
> 
> ----- End of forwarded message from Jose Luis Carretero Garcia -----
> 
> -- 
> Rob Hartill (robh@imdb.com)    
> http://www.imdb.com/  ... why wait for a clear night to see the stars?.
> 
> 

--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--
brian@organic.com  www.apache.org  hyperreal.com  http://www.organic.com/JOBS


Mime
View raw message