Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.7.5/V2.0) id LAA05116; Sat, 24 Aug 1996 11:59:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aldhfn.aldhfn.org by taz.hyperreal.com (8.7.5/V2.0) with SMTP id LAA05109; Sat, 24 Aug 1996 11:59:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from main.slink.com (slink.com [199.18.242.17]) by aldhfn.aldhfn.org (8.6.12/8.6.11.1) with SMTP id OAA22024 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 1996 14:53:30 -0400 Received: from garey.slink.com by main.slink.com (IBM OS/2 SENDMAIL VERSION 1.3.17/(1.0sosum) for new-httpd@hyperreal.com; id AA1207; Sat, 24 Aug 96 15:01:04 -0400 Message-Id: <9608241901.AA1207@main.slink.com> From: "Garey Smiley" To: "new-httpd@hyperreal.com" Date: Sat, 24 Aug 96 15:00:46 -0400 Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Garey Smiley's Registered PMMail 1.52 For OS/2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Efficiency question Sender: owner-new-httpd@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com On Fri, 23 Aug 1996 08:30:58 -0400 (EDT), rasmus@bellglobal.com wrote: >I have been asked to have a look at what it would take to implement a >highly efficient Apache module which would count hits on pages. The >pages get 1-2 million hits per day. With that kind of traffic, anything >Perl or CGI based is obviously out of the question. I was thinking more >along the lines of a daemon process running separately to which the >various httpd's would set up a permanent connection (shared memory perhaps?) >and increment page counts this way. The daemon process would occasionally >flush the counts to disk. > >Do you guys think this would be the most efficient route to go? Has anybody >built anything architecturally similar that I could look at? Take a look at the TGI stuff on the Apache for OS/2 page (http://www.slink.com/ApacheOS2/). Garey Smiley SoftLink Services garey@slink.com http://www.slink.com/ (330)848-1312 FAX/Data(330)699-4474