Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) id KAA26711; Fri, 2 Aug 1996 10:50:09 -0700 Received: from arachnet.algroup.co.uk by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) with SMTP id KAA26697; Fri, 2 Aug 1996 10:50:04 -0700 Received: from heap.ben.algroup.co.uk by arachnet.algroup.co.uk id aa17361; 2 Aug 96 18:49 BST Received: from gonzo.ben.algroup.co.uk by heap.ben.algroup.co.uk id aa16871; 2 Aug 96 18:07 BST Subject: Re: arrrrgh! To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com Date: Fri, 2 Aug 1996 18:01:58 +0100 (BST) From: Ben Laurie In-Reply-To: from "Alexei Kosut" at Aug 2, 96 10:37:11 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24 PGP2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 1167 Message-ID: <9608021802.aa21726@gonzo.ben.algroup.co.uk> Sender: owner-new-httpd@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com Alexei Kosut wrote: > > On Fri, 2 Aug 1996, Alexei Kosut wrote: > > > I dunno. The other way to interpret the spec, which is still correct, is > > to still treat a non-port Host: header as port 80, but not allow port > > switches. In other words, if the port sent doesn't match the port that > > they've connected on, just ignore the Host: header. This is the same thing > > we do, for example, if someone sends "Host: some.nonexistent.domain". > > Don't I feel like an idiot now... this is exactly what the Apache code > does now (the development version, not 1.1.1). *sigh* Does it? Oh good! > > Somebody just slap me in the face with a wet noodle. Hang on ... I'm just cooking some up... ;-) Cheers, Ben. > > -- Alexei Kosut The Apache HTTP Server > http://www.nueva.pvt.k12.ca.us/~akosut/ http://www.apache.org/ > -- Ben Laurie Phone: +44 (181) 994 6435 Freelance Consultant and Fax: +44 (181) 994 6472 Technical Director Email: ben@algroup.co.uk A.L. Digital Ltd, URL: http://www.algroup.co.uk London, England. Apache Group member (http://www.apache.org)