Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.7.5/V2.0) id LAA07403;
 Fri, 9 Aug 1996 11:28:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from life.ai.mit.edu by taz.hyperreal.com (8.7.5/V2.0) with SMTP id
 LAA07391; Fri, 9 Aug 1996 11:28:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from synergy.ai.mit.edu by life.ai.mit.edu (4.1/AI-4.10) for
 new-httpd@hyperreal.com id AA22513; Fri, 9 Aug 96 14:28:15 EDT
From: rst@ai.mit.edu (Robert S. Thau)
Received: by synergy.ai.mit.edu (8.6.12/AI-4.10) id OAA16297;
 Fri, 9 Aug 1996 14:28:14 -0400
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 1996 14:28:14 -0400
Message-Id: <199608091828.OAA16297@synergy.ai.mit.edu>
To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com
Subject: Re:  possible bug?
Sender: owner-new-httpd@apache.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com

  Running a trace on the
  running web processes shows every process (except the parent) waiting
  in an accept() function call.

Hmmm... this is the symptom of the infamous SOMAXCONN problem.  Has
the site gotten busier recently, or has the local routing configuration
changed much?

rst