Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) id MAA09983; Fri, 2 Aug 1996 12:47:51 -0700 Received: from apollo.eusoft.com by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) with ESMTP id MAA09976; Fri, 2 Aug 1996 12:47:45 -0700 Received: by apollo.eusoft.com from localhost (router,SLmail95 V1.2,beta 1); Fri, 02 Aug 1996 21:46:25 EDT Received: by apollo.eusoft.com from merkur.eusoft.com (194.148.28.43::mail daemon; unverified,SLmail95 V1.2,beta 1); Fri, 02 Aug 1996 21:46:23 EDT From: "Christian Gross" To: Subject: Re: random questions... Date: Fri, 2 Aug 1996 21:43:13 +0200 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1085 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <19960802214625.1eeb1254.in@apollo.eusoft.com> Sender: owner-new-httpd@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com Hi > > 3) the webserver survey is out as usual. apache's doing great but NT > > (ie Microsoft IIS) will have > 10% of the web inside 2 > > months, which means Apache Group won't really have as much > > clout when it comes to 'influencing' standards. Does anyone > > care? > > Deeply. What do we do? Supporting Apache on NT would probably be a > start. Any _other_ masocists in this group? > Ok my release of Apache for NT is currently a hack and needs cleaning, but I would be willing to help all of you to get a good solution for NT and UNIX.... As stated earlier I have access to the following OS's Win95 Multi-processor NT Solaris for Sparc and Solaris for INTEL. So lets get going on this then.... -- Christian Gross euSOFT Phone 41.1.492.7827 Fax 41.1.492.7757 http://www.eusoft.com cgross@eusoft.com