httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: HTTP/1.1
Date Sat, 31 Aug 1996 21:01:22 GMT
Alexei Kosut wrote:
> 
> On Sat, 31 Aug 1996, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> 
> > > ***************
> > > *** 245,251 ****
> > >   
> > >   
> > > ! #define SERVER_PROTOCOL "HTTP/1.0"
> > >   
> > > --- 245,251 ----
> > >   
> > > ! #define SERVER_PROTOCOL "HTTP/1.1"
> > > -- 
> > 
> > Is that right? Shouldn't the SERVER_PROTOCOL be wrapped by FORHTTP11
> > so that it's still 1.0 unless FORHTTP11 is defined?
> > 
> > Or maybe I'm not sure what FORHTTP11 does.
> 
> That's what it used to do. The patch, if you note, actually *removes*
> all instances of FORHTTP11 (it was a wrapper just to say "don't
> activate this code yet" Now it's okay to.).
> 


Ohhhh, I read that 180degree wrong


-- 
Jim Jagielski  << jim@jaguNET.com >>   |   "There is a time for laughing,
  **  jaguNET Access Services  **      |    and a time for not laughing,
      Email: info@jaguNET.com          |    and this is not one of them"
++    http://www.jaguNET.com/         +++      Voice/Fax: 410-931-3157       ++

Mime
View raw message