httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <>
Subject Re: suEXEC
Date Sat, 03 Aug 1996 05:50:44 GMT
Randy Terbush wrote:
> One comment regarding configuration of the suEXEC functionality.
> Jason and I have decided not to make changes to the various
> Makefiles, etc. to make this compile as part of the server
> or compilation of ./support. It was our feeling that this needs
> to have some motivation behind getting it to work.

Considering the tests that suEXEC places on the script, which are
similar to those done by cgiwrap, I think suEXEC looks like a nice
addition. I'm sure there are site currently using cgiwrap that would
appreciate the advantages of one less exec().

Jim Jagielski  << >>   |   "There is a time for laughing,
  **  jaguNET Access Services  **      |    and a time for not laughing,
      Email:          |    and this is not one of them"
++         +++      Voice/Fax: 410-931-3157       ++

View raw message