Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) id NAA06462; Wed, 3 Jul 1996 13:12:51 -0700 Received: from paris.ics.uci.edu by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) with SMTP id NAA06454; Wed, 3 Jul 1996 13:12:49 -0700 Received: from liege.ics.uci.edu by paris.ics.uci.edu id aa24648; 3 Jul 96 12:58 PDT To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com Subject: Re: Question on 1.1 In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 03 Jul 1996 12:44:06 PDT." Date: Wed, 03 Jul 1996 12:58:22 -0700 From: "Roy T. Fielding" Message-ID: <9607031258.aa24648@paris.ics.uci.edu> Sender: owner-new-httpd@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com > I'm about to revise the Apache pages and dist stuff to feature 1.1 instead > of 1.0.5. My question is this: should we still have 1.0.5 in there? Should > it still be linked from the main page with a copy in /dist? Nope. > I'm leaning towards not doing this; only reffering to 1.1.0, and moving > all other, older versions into Old. This makes sense to me, after all, > 1.1.0 is supposed to be a released, "stable" version, so we should > advocate its use, and not confuse things with older versions. Yep, move it to old. I would also delete any binaries older than 1.0.5. ......Roy