Message-Id: <199607261825.NAA29078@sierra.zyzzyva.com>
To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com
Subject: Re: setrlimit config Directives 
In-reply-to: akosut's message of Fri, 26 Jul 1996 11:06:51 -0700.
         <Pine.SOL.3.93.960726110443.6771A-100000@acidik.organic.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 1996 13:25:10 -0500
From: Randy Terbush <randy@zyzzyva.com>
Sender: owner-new-httpd@apache.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com

> On Fri, 26 Jul 1996, Randy Terbush wrote:
> 
> > Please review the following patch.
> > 
> > These changes add support for RLimitCPU, RLimitMEM, and RLimitNPROC.
> 
> I don't know about the internals, but I'd perfer the directive functions
> themselves be outside the #ifdefs, not inside. That way you can put
> "RLimitCPU" in a config file of a machine that doesn't support it, and it
> could tell you that it doesn't support it, instead of "Unknown directive"
> or whatnot. (which could be rather confusing to someone who doesn't quite
> understand).
> 
> -- Alexei Kosut <akosut@organic.com>            The Apache HTTP Server 
>    http://www.nueva.pvt.k12.ca.us/~akosut/      http://www.apache.org/

Good idea. Change made. I'm going to see if I can address Ben's 
concerns here. The patch as it stands would solve some of the
problems that have been reported lately.