Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) id OAA10856; Wed, 17 Jul 1996 14:53:45 -0700 Received: from localhost by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) with SMTP id OAA10849; Wed, 17 Jul 1996 14:53:43 -0700 X-Received: from the.secret.org by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) with ESMTP id XAA21255; Tue, 16 Jul 1996 23:38:14 -0700 X-Received: (from lucid@localhost) by the.secret.org (8.6.12/8.6.12) id CAA06319 for new-httpd@hyperreal.com; Wed, 17 Jul 1996 02:41:03 -0400 From: Lucid Message-Id: <199607170641.CAA06319@the.secret.org> Subject: Re: security holes and other fun stuff To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com Date: Wed, 17 Jul 1996 02:41:00 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: from "Alexei Kosut" at Jul 16, 96 05:21:32 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 1079 ReSent-Date: Wed, 17 Jul 1996 14:53:40 -0700 (PDT) ReSent-From: Brian Behlendorf ReSent-To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com ReSent-Message-ID: Sender: owner-new-httpd@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com Did you add 127.0.0.2 as an interface and add a route to loopback etc... It almost sounds like what happens when I add a vhost to an ip address that isnt attached to the ethernet card... -bill > > On Tue, 16 Jul 1996, Ben Laurie wrote: > > > Whilst we're on the subject of virtual hosts, something has been nagging at me. > > The other day, we set up a server running on 127.0.0.1. Then we wanted to > > extend it to 127.0.0.2 (we were doing some experiments), so the trainee > > Webmaster set up two virtual hosts: > > > > > > stuff > > > > > > > > stuff > > > > > > This caused Apache to crash. Commenting out the first pair of VirtualHosts > > sorted it out. It would be neat if this worked, IMHO. Certainly it shouldn't > > crash. > > I've never tried 127.0.0.2, but 127.0.0.1 has never crashed on me; always > seems to work fine. > > -- Alexei Kosut The Apache HTTP Server > http://www.nueva.pvt.k12.ca.us/~akosut/ http://www.apache.org/ > >