Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) id OAA29553; Thu, 11 Jul 1996 14:40:32 -0700 Received: from life.ai.mit.edu by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) with SMTP id OAA29544; Thu, 11 Jul 1996 14:40:29 -0700 Received: from skydive.ai.mit.edu by life.ai.mit.edu (4.1/AI-4.10) for new-httpd@hyperreal.com id AA29596; Thu, 11 Jul 96 17:40:14 EDT From: rst@ai.mit.edu (Robert S. Thau) Received: by skydive.ai.mit.edu (8.6.12/AI-4.10) id RAA23423; Thu, 11 Jul 1996 17:40:19 -0400 Date: Thu, 11 Jul 1996 17:40:19 -0400 Message-Id: <199607112140.RAA23423@skydive.ai.mit.edu> To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com Subject: Re: Configurable nph filenames Sender: owner-new-httpd@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com Cliff, you are talking as if you think that most of the code in the server would have to be severely reworked to run threaded. This is simply not correct. The magnitude of the change is nowhere *near* the shift from Apache 0.6 to Shambhala. Not in the same ballpark. Perhaps in the same city, but heading out towards the 'burbs. In fact, most of the current threaded server prototype is pretty much identical to the corresponding code in straight Apache. This is in some measure because, in the "traumatic" Shambhala rework, I deliberately anticipated the additional work needed to run the thing threaded. This is not to say that it's in shape to be released tomorrow; it's a prototype, not a finished, polished product. However, most of the remaining work is mopping up details and packaging (getting the status module working is the most difficult item I'm aware of). If you could say what *specifically* has you worried, I think the discussion would be a whole lot more productive. rst