Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) id EAA02992; Thu, 11 Jul 1996 04:23:08 -0700 Received: from epprod.elsevier.co.uk by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) with ESMTP id EAA02978; Thu, 11 Jul 1996 04:23:03 -0700 Received: from snowdon.elsevier.co.uk (snowdon.elsevier.co.uk [193.131.197.164]) by epprod.elsevier.co.uk (8.6.13/8.6.12) with ESMTP id MAA29317 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 1996 12:21:05 +0100 Received: from cadair.elsevier.co.uk (actually host cadair) by snowdon with SMTP (PP); Thu, 11 Jul 1996 12:21:34 +0100 Received: (from dpr@localhost) by cadair.elsevier.co.uk (8.6.13/8.6.12) id MAA20137; Thu, 11 Jul 1996 12:20:17 +0100 Date: Thu, 11 Jul 1996 12:20:17 +0100 Message-Id: <199607111120.MAA20137@cadair.elsevier.co.uk> To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com Cc: "Homer W. Smith" , Mark Shuttleworth Subject: Re: 1.1 Apache and SSL [Long] In-Reply-To: References: From: Paul Richards X-Attribution: Paul X-Mailer: GNU Emacs [19.30.1], RMAIL, Mailcrypt [3.3] Sender: owner-new-httpd@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com David Robinson writes: > > At the risk of sounding repititious, > a. Wouldn't having an SSL Apache outside the US prevent any US individuals > from working on Apache? Not if there was still a US server. The way FreeBSD works is that the official releases are US only and come from WC but there's a mirror site maintained in S. Africa that has separately implemented versions of all the non-exportable bits. This setup is perfectly legal since the US folks never have anything to do with the SA server so there's no collaboration.