From: Jim Jagielski <jim@jaguNET.com>
Message-Id: <199607101827.OAA27235@shado.jaguNET.com>
Subject: Re: Too soon for 1.2 commits ??
To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 1996 14:27:22 -0400 (EDT)
In-Reply-To: <199607101759.NAA32230@hershey.ai.mit.edu> from "Robert S. Thau"
 at Jul 10, 96 01:59:24 pm
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-new-httpd@apache.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com

Robert S. Thau wrote:
> 
>   What I was objecting to was the implementation of strcasestr.
> 
> So, I'll ask again --- what's wrong with it?  It could be made a bit
> faster, sure, but given where this routine is being called, I'm not sure
> that reducing its cost to zero would have a measurable impact on any
> useful measure of the server's end-to-end performance.  Given that,
> keeping the code simple and maintainable is by far the best policy.
> 

Agreed, but it would be a snap to implement it using strncasecmp, which
already exists...


-- 
Jim Jagielski  << jim@jaguNET.com >>   |      "That's a Smith & Wesson,
  **  jaguNET Access Services  **      |       and you've had your six" 
      Email: info@jaguNET.com          |             - James Bond
++    http://www.jaguNET.com/         +++      Voice/Fax: 410-931-3157       ++