From: Jim Jagielski <jim@jaguNET.com>
Message-Id: <199607011353.JAA20921@shado.jaguNET.com>
Subject: Patches
To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 1996 09:53:00 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-new-httpd@apache.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com

As a general trouble maker, let me see if I have this right.

   Patch A: Changes things like HAS_GMTOFF to HAVE_GMTOFF and is
    derided loud and long as being too much too late. Patch
    removed.

   Patch B: Involves some heavy-duty changes to mod_cern_meta.c
    as well as a semi-substantial change to the way the
    module works (from per-server to per-directory). It is
    added "much" later that Patch A. The resultant outcry?
    One very nice message stating "isn't this kinda big?"
    Patch remains.


Is something wrong here?

PS: I'm NOT promoting that Patch A be reinstated or Patch B be
    removed... Just a general observation as a devil's advocate.
-- 
Jim Jagielski  << jim@jaguNET.com >>   |      "That's a Smith & Wesson,
  **  jaguNET Access Services  **      |       and you've had your six" 
      Email: info@jaguNET.com          |             - James Bond
++    http://www.jaguNET.com/         +++      Voice/Fax: 410-931-3157       ++