httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Brian Behlendorf <br...@organic.com>
Subject Re: Binaries for 1.1
Date Mon, 01 Jul 1996 19:50:59 GMT
On Mon, 1 Jul 1996, Randy Terbush wrote:
> BTW - No response to my question about whether we need to create
> Solaris 2.5 binaries, and if so shall I?

I don't *think* there should be much difference - I'll actually be
building 2.5, not 2.4, at any rate.  I am more concerned about sunos 4.1.3
vs. 4.1.4 - building both might be a good idea, as well as HPUX 9 and 10
if we can.

I've updated http://hyperreal.com/httpd/binaries.html to use Sameer's (and
gcc's) naming conventions, though I couldn't figure out the one for SCO -
any idea? Ben, are you still able to build that?  Sameer's generous offer
of a number of platforms to compile for merits him 8 distributions to
build :)  Please, all, take a look at that document.

	Brian

--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--
brian@organic.com  www.apache.org  hyperreal.com  http://www.organic.com/JOBS


Mime
View raw message