httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nathan Schrenk <>
Subject Microsoft's "amazing" web servers
Date Tue, 16 Jul 1996 00:55:16 GMT

I have just viewed some behavior at that I have not seen 
before, and I thought other members of this list might be interested, 
although this is off-topic. currently resolves to 9 different IP addresses.  Some of 
those addresses are serving HTTP traffic on port 80, and some of them are 
refusing connections.  The browser I'm using, Netscape 2.02 for Solaris, 
doesn't behave very well when trying to connect to this site.  Evidently, 
Netscape looks at the first address it gets from the DNS and attempts to 
connect to it.  When that fails, it pops up an error message.  When I use 
Solaris' telnet client to connect to port 80 on I will get 
one or more "Connection refused" messages as telnet goes through the list 
of addresses attempting connections and then I'll get a connection that's 
accepted that I can use.

So who is at fault here?  Is Microsoft at fault for having servers that 
are down, or is Netscape at fault for not checking each one of the 
addresses that are in the DNS?  Or perhaps the failure of my browser to 
communicate to this server is just a casualty of different, but not 
technically incorrect, interpretations of various Internet standards?


PS: When I first viewed this behavior I was totally bewildered as it 
seemed that the server was sending a "Connection refused" message but 
then opening the connection anyway.  It was not until I ended up doing an 
nslookup on that I realized that the "Connection refused" 
messages were coming from a different machine than the one I eventually 
connected with.x

Nathan Schrenk
Neoglyphics Media Corp.                    

View raw message