httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ben Laurie <...@gonzo.ben.algroup.co.uk>
Subject Re: Configurable nph filenames
Date Thu, 11 Jul 1996 19:37:12 GMT
Robert S. Thau wrote:
> 
>   Is it a value, i.e. "CGI-buffering: 1024" means only buffer in 1024 byte
>   chunks, or is it a boolean?  If it's a boolean I think we should keep it
>   out of the CGI headers and make it another file type, a la the addhandler
>   patch as posted.
> 
> Well, the reason for putting CGI- in the name is to try to avoid
> collisions with future HTTP versions; that's the only thing I feel
> strongly about.  As to the rest, we might want to take it to www-talk;
> personally, I've never used the feature and have no strong feelings
> either way.

Are we allowed to just invent headers? Suppose that header is one day defined
to mean something different? That's why I thought X-Apache- was a good idea,
anyway.

On the subject of content, I think I'd like to be able to define a buffer size
and a timeout.

> 
> However, as a matter of keeping the architecture clean, I would *not*
> want Yet Another File Type --- for a single flag, it doesn't look too
> bad, but once we had separate types for plain CGI, unbuffered scripts,
> child-checked scripts, child-checked and unbuffered scripts, and all
> the other combinations involving the *next* CGI flag bit, it really
> would start to get hard to manage.

Agreed.

Cheers,

Ben.

> 
> rst

-- 
Ben Laurie                  Phone: +44 (181) 994 6435
Freelance Consultant and    Fax:   +44 (181) 994 6472
Technical Director          Email: ben@algroup.co.uk
A.L. Digital Ltd,           URL: http://www.algroup.co.uk
London, England.

Mime
View raw message