httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chuck Murcko <ch...@telebase.com>
Subject Re: Binaries for 1.1
Date Wed, 03 Jul 1996 17:50:21 GMT
Rob Hartill liltingly intones:
> 
> 
> > > I'll take a shot at it.
> > > 
> > > I can do a NexT black box and a HP PA-Risc version.
> > 
> > Great.  I'm kinda nervous about the NeXT since we've been kinda unable to
> > really test it out and a lot of compilation errors have been forwarded our
> > way...
> > 
> > By "HP PA-Risc" do you mean HPUX, and which version?  Do 9.x and 10.x need
> > different binaries?
> 
> No I mean a HP binary for NeXT and a black-box (motorolla) binary for NeXT
> 
> I'll do a HPUX 9.x if nobody else does.
> 
> -=-==-
> 
> So use the standard Configuration file with no changes other than the
> compiler/flags  ?
> 
> Stripped binary?
> 
> I'll watch to see what others do about packaging and naming.
> 
Don't we have packaging/naming conventions on the developer page?
Or did we change them again?

http://www.hyperreal.com/httpd/binaries.html

chuck
Chuck Murcko	N2K Inc.	Wayne PA	chuck@telebase.com
And now, on a lighter note:
Support bacteria -- it's the only culture some people have!

Mime
View raw message