Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) id SAA27259; Sat, 8 Jun 1996 18:11:33 -0700 Received: from mail.barrnet.net by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) with ESMTP id SAA27254; Sat, 8 Jun 1996 18:11:32 -0700 Received: from ace.nueva.pvt.k12.ca.us (ace.nueva.pvt.k12.ca.us [198.31.42.1]) by mail.barrnet.net (8.7.5/MAIL-RELAY-LEN) with ESMTP id SAA13856 for ; Sat, 8 Jun 1996 18:11:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost by ace.nueva.pvt.k12.ca.us with SMTP (1.37.109.16/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA120852688; Sat, 8 Jun 1996 18:11:29 -0700 Date: Sat, 8 Jun 1996 18:11:28 -0700 (PDT) From: Alexei Kosut To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com Subject: Re: all clear In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-new-httpd@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com On Fri, 7 Jun 1996, Brian Behlendorf wrote: > I'm sorry if it seems like I'm being a bottleneck here, but our *primary* > interest at this point should be to flush out bugs, not add new > features. stars.path I see as not quite a feature addition, not quite a > bug, and I suppose I can acquiesce on that. spath.patch I want to stew Good enough for me... I'm committing it. (and it does have three +1 votes). > on a little bit more... just to consider how we would use it, or if its > inclusion would affect us at all. If for *no*other*reason* than it > affects the core, not just a module. Point taken. But, IMHO, it's an important addition to the core. Or have I said that yet? > But, if three +1 votes come in for that patch, then by the apache rules > (which I agree with) my sloth is voided. I think it needs one more. Anyone? -- ________________________________________________________________________ Alexei Kosut The Apache HTTP Server URL: http://www.nueva.pvt.k12.ca.us/~akosut/ http://www.apache.org/ "War does not determine who is right, only who is left."