Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) id KAA25391;
 Thu, 6 Jun 1996 10:43:54 -0700
Received: from hume.esi.co.uk by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) with ESMTP
 id KAA25386; Thu, 6 Jun 1996 10:43:51 -0700
Received: (from drtr@localhost) by hume.esi.co.uk (8.6.9/8.6.9) id SAA05085;
 Thu, 6 Jun 1996 18:43:19 +0100
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 1996 18:43:18 +0100 (BST)
From: David Robinson <drtr@esi.co.uk>
To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com
Subject: Re: Proxy module
In-Reply-To: <9606051727.aa17675@gonzo.ben.algroup.co.uk>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSD/.3.91.960606184239.4995B-100000@hume.esi.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-new-httpd@apache.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com

On Wed, 5 Jun 1996, Ben Laurie wrote:

> Chuck Murcko wrote:
> > 
> > David Robinson liltingly intones:
> > > 
> > > Can someone tell me precisely why the proxy module is considered likely 
> > > to delete ones hard disk, and also send me the changes that introduced this?
> > > 
> > Dunno. It hasn't done anything of the sort here under test.
> 
> Its because the garbage collection now has to do a directory tree descent.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Ben.

So how do we make it non-dangerous and yet still do tree descent?

 David.