Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) id WAA12881; Sun, 2 Jun 1996 22:48:37 -0700 Received: from paris.ics.uci.edu by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) with SMTP id WAA12873; Sun, 2 Jun 1996 22:48:35 -0700 Received: from liege.ics.uci.edu by paris.ics.uci.edu id aa19093; 2 Jun 96 22:44 PDT To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com Subject: Re: more on ServerPath In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 02 Jun 1996 20:20:39 PDT." Date: Sun, 02 Jun 1996 22:44:12 -0700 From: "Roy T. Fielding" Message-ID: <9606022244.aa19093@paris.ics.uci.edu> Sender: owner-new-httpd@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com > At any rate, I figured we'd better implement it before Roy Fielding > lets slip that he promised some people that Apache would do so. At > least according to Jim Gettys in <9605311843.AA04961@zorch.w3.org> on > http-wg, he did: > > ! the time (per Klensin's original recommendations), but Roy successfully > ! argued us (in the Palo Alto meeting) around to a more slightly more > ! loose definition, by promising he'd personally make sure that Apache > ! correctly implemented the host requirements and report errors properly I only promised him that Apache would implement the final host requirements properly when we started to call ourselves HTTP/1.1 -- the rationale being that I will veto anything calling itself HTTP/1.1 that is obviously not obeying the 1.1 requirements for Host. That is, after all, why I am the HTTP cop. ......Roy [who hasn't promised anything else, honest...]