Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) id PAA13752;
 Wed, 26 Jun 1996 15:05:27 -0700
Received: from life.ai.mit.edu by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) with SMTP
 id PAA13740; Wed, 26 Jun 1996 15:05:24 -0700
Received: from hershey.ai.mit.edu by life.ai.mit.edu (4.1/AI-4.10) for
 new-httpd@hyperreal.com id AA23224; Wed, 26 Jun 96 18:05:25 EDT
From: rst@ai.mit.edu (Robert S. Thau)
Received: by hershey.ai.mit.edu (8.6.12/AI-4.10) id SAA04576;
 Wed, 26 Jun 1996 18:02:29 -0400
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 1996 18:02:29 -0400
Message-Id: <199606262202.SAA04576@hershey.ai.mit.edu>
To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com
Subject: Re: SET_BYTES_SENT (problem with run_sub_req())
Sender: owner-new-httpd@apache.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com

  The problem is that using run_sub_req() causes a SEGV because
  sub->main is not being initialized.

In what circumstances is sub->main not being initialized?
(sub_req_lookup_{uri,file} both call sub_req_set_protocol, which
initializes sub->main, among many other things).

rst