Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) id KAA01635; Mon, 10 Jun 1996 10:20:30 -0700 Received: from battra.telebase.com by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) with ESMTP id KAA01622; Mon, 10 Jun 1996 10:20:23 -0700 Received: from wormhole.telebase.com by battra.telebase.com id NAA17879 for ; Mon, 10 Jun 1996 13:19:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from spudboy.telebase.com (chuck@spudboy.telebase.com [172.16.2.215]) by wormhole.telebase.com (8.7.3/8.6.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA02820 for ; Mon, 10 Jun 1996 13:19:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from chuck@localhost) by spudboy.telebase.com (8.6.12/8.6.9.1) id NAA24894 for new-httpd@hyperreal.com; Mon, 10 Jun 1996 13:19:50 -0400 From: Chuck Murcko Message-Id: <199606101719.NAA24894@telebase.com.> Subject: Re: WWW Form Bug Report: "solaris is missing inet_aton" on Solaris 2.x (fwd) To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com Date: Mon, 10 Jun 1996 13:19:50 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: from "Cliff Skolnick" at Jun 10, 96 09:45:38 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-new-httpd@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com Sigh. The face that inet_addr() didn't work was why I used inet_aton(). I'll change it back & try to get inet_addr to work. Cliff Skolnick liltingly intones: > > > proxy people, inet_aton is a new BSD call. Gotta use the icky inet_addr() > call. > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > Date: Mon Jun 10 9:39:22 1996 > From: angelos@netaxis.com > To: cliff@organic.com > Subject: WWW Form Bug Report: "solaris is missing inet_aton" on Solaris 2.x > > Submitter: angelos@netaxis.com > Operating system: Solaris 2.x, version: 5.4 > Version of Apache Used: 1.1b3 > Extra Modules used: mod_proxy > URL exhibiting problem: > > Symptoms: > -- > in mod_proxy there is a call to inet_aton > solaris has no such sys call > -- > > Backtrace: > -- > > -- > > chuck Chuck Murcko N2K Inc. Wayne PA chuck@telebase.com And now, on a lighter note: The average woman would rather have beauty than brains, because the average man can see better than he can think.