Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) id LAA01329; Sat, 8 Jun 1996 11:36:24 -0700 Received: from atropos.c2.org by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) with ESMTP id LAA01324; Sat, 8 Jun 1996 11:36:22 -0700 From: sameer@c2.org Received: (from sameer@localhost) by atropos.c2.org (8.7.4/CSUA) id LAA19923 for new-httpd@hyperreal.com; Sat, 8 Jun 1996 11:36:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199606081836.LAA19923@atropos.c2.org> Subject: Re: 1.1b3 and things??? To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com Date: Sat, 8 Jun 1996 11:36:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: from "rasmus@madhaus.utcs.utoronto.ca" at Jun 8, 96 00:30:39 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24 ME8a] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-new-httpd@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com > > Hold on, if it isn't illegal to export crypto to Canada from the US, and > it isn't illegal to export crypto from Canada to the rest of the world, > how is it restricted? Or is there some agreement somewhere between the > two countries that I am not aware of? (not that I have ever paid much > attention to this) Canada and the US don't exactly see eye to eye on a > lot of these foreign policy issues (ie. Cuba). This is lovely stuff. It is legal to export crypto from the US to Canada. It is legal to export crypto from Canada. It is *illegal* to export crypto from Canada to outside the US/Canada if the crypto was obtained from the United States and is being reexported "without substantial modifications." Beats the hell out of me how they define "substantial modifications" -- Sameer Parekh Voice: 510-601-9777x3 Community ConneXion, Inc. FAX: 510-601-9734 The Internet Privacy Provider Dialin: 510-658-6376 http://www.c2.net/ (or login as "guest") sameer@c2.net