Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) id KAA05034;
 Sat, 1 Jun 1996 10:24:04 -0700
Received: from colin.muc.de by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) with SMTP id
 KAA05015; Sat, 1 Jun 1996 10:23:59 -0700
Received: from en by colin.muc.de with UUCP id <86019-1>;
 Sat, 1 Jun 1996 19:23:16 +0200
Received: by en.muc.de (Sendmail5.67a8/IDA-1.5)
	id AA13803; Sat, 1 Jun 1996 13:06:00 +0200
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 1996 13:06:00 +0200
From: "Ralf S. Engelschall" <rse@en.muc.de>
Message-Id: <199606011106.AA13803@en.muc.de>
To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com
Subject: Re: That rewrite module
Newsgroups: en.lists.apache-new-httpd
Organization: Engelschall (EN) Privat, Dachau/Munich, Germany
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
X-Charset: ASCII
X-Char-Esc: 29
Sender: owner-new-httpd@apache.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com

On 31 May 1996 15:12:48 +0200 in en.lists.apache-new-httpd you wrote:
> Why not put the 'old' directives into that module, just
> for backward compatibility and the line of least resistance

On sunday I will write a tiny mod_rewrite_compat.c or such a beast which only
includes stub-code for the old directives, i.e.  these stubs directly do the
transition to the Rewrite* directives of mod_rewrite.c !

It this way ok?
                                        Ralf S. Engelschall    
                                        rse@en.muc.de
                                        http://www.muc.de/~rse