Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) id EAA21783; Fri, 17 May 1996 04:23:25 -0700 Received: from arachnet.algroup.co.uk by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) with SMTP id EAA21769; Fri, 17 May 1996 04:23:16 -0700 Received: from heap.ben.algroup.co.uk by arachnet.algroup.co.uk id aa01490; 17 May 96 12:22 BST Received: from gonzo.ben.algroup.co.uk by heap.ben.algroup.co.uk id aa02255; 17 May 96 11:48 BST Subject: Re: 1.1b3 ? To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com Date: Fri, 17 May 1996 11:43:50 +0100 (BST) From: Ben Laurie In-Reply-To: <199605171059.GAA21529@telebase.com.> from "Chuck Murcko" at May 17, 96 06:59:22 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24 PGP2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 1049 Message-ID: <9605171143.aa21886@gonzo.ben.algroup.co.uk> Sender: owner-new-httpd@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com Chuck Murcko wrote: > > Rob Hartill liltingly intones: > > > > > > Are we waiting for anything before 1.1b3 can be set loose? > > > > if not, can someone please roll a tarfile so the it can be tested > > and then released to the masses. > > > Wasn't there something about setting SO_LINGER on some SVR4 systems? > We had a user patch but it was scary. I don't understand why LINGER should be used. According to my man, SO_LINGER causes the close() to block until all data is sent. It should have no effect on the sending of the data. So, what's it all about? Cheers, Ben. > > chuck > Chuck Murcko N2K Inc. Wayne PA chuck@telebase.com > And now, on a lighter note: > "I don't have to take this abuse from you -- I've got hundreds of > people waiting to abuse me." > -- Bill Murray, "Ghostbusters" -- Ben Laurie Phone: +44 (181) 994 6435 Freelance Consultant and Fax: +44 (181) 994 6472 Technical Director Email: ben@algroup.co.uk A.L. Digital Ltd, URL: http://www.algroup.co.uk London, England.