Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) id OAA07524; Wed, 22 May 1996 14:16:14 -0700 Received: from hedgehog.mcom.com by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) with ESMTP id OAA07518; Wed, 22 May 1996 14:16:10 -0700 Received: from core ([205.217.251.72]) by hedgehog.mcom.com (Netscape Mail Server v1.1) with SMTP id AAA2926 for ; Wed, 22 May 1996 14:14:41 -0700 Message-ID: <31A382CB.41C6@netscape.com> Date: Wed, 22 May 1996 14:10:35 -0700 From: Rob McCool Organization: Netscape Communications X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (X11; I; IRIX 5.3 IP22) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com Subject: Re: (fwd) Re: Apache vs Netscape Commerce Server References: <199605221536.IAA24624@infinity.c2.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-new-httpd@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com sameer wrote: > > As I understand it, under NS 1.x, which he's running because 2.0 > > isn't on BSDI yet, the min and max process settings very similarly > > to the way they behave on Apache. The server starts 16 processes and > > spawns up to 16 more as they're needed. > > That's not the way apache works. Oh. Well, it was the last time I looked (which was a long time ago). So the way Apache works now is that it starts with StartServers processes, will allow growth only up to a total of MaxClients, with a number of spares between MinSpareServers and MaxSpareServers. Right? Seems like a more intuitive model from a configuration standpoint. -- Rob McCool, robm@netscape.com http://home.netscape.com/people/robm/ Stunt Programmer, Netscape Communications Corporation It was working ten minutes ago, I swear...