Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) id OAA06354;
 Fri, 31 May 1996 14:36:30 -0700
Received: from battra.telebase.com by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) with
 ESMTP id OAA06347; Fri, 31 May 1996 14:36:25 -0700
Received: from wormhole.telebase.com  by battra.telebase.com id RAA16017 for
 <new-httpd@hyperreal.com>; Fri, 31 May 1996 17:36:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from mail@localhost) by wormhole.telebase.com (8.7.3/8.6.9.1) id
 RAA15229 for <new-httpd@hyperreal.com>; Fri, 31 May 1996 17:36:16 -0400 (EDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: wormhole.telebase.com: mail set sender to
 <chuck@telebase.com> using -f
Received: from spudboy.telebase.com(172.16.2.215) by wormhole.telebase.com via
 smap (V1.3)
	id sma015223; Fri May 31 17:36:10 1996
Received: (from chuck@localhost) by spudboy.telebase.com (8.6.12/8.6.9.1) id
 RAA26163 for new-httpd@hyperreal.com; Fri, 31 May 1996 17:36:10 -0400
From: Chuck Murcko <chuck@telebase.com>
Message-Id: <199605312136.RAA26163@telebase.com.>
Subject: Re: who's using 1.1b3-dev in the real world?
To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com
Date: Fri, 31 May 1996 17:36:09 -0400 (EDT)
In-Reply-To: <199605312026.AA267564393@ooo.lanl.gov> from "Rob Hartill" at May
 31, 96 02:26:33 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-new-httpd@apache.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com

Rob Hartill liltingly intones:
> 
> 
> I'm going to compile it for my FreeBSD boxes tonight and put it on some
> busy servers. Has anyone seen it fall over?
> 
> I assume there's very little that's going to change now between 1.1b3-dev
> and 1.1b3 public. Is this the case?
> 
Running so far for about a week at 150,000+ hits/day. Watch out for
mod_imap. We're running a test version of the proxy here, too.

chuck
Chuck Murcko	N2K Inc.	Wayne PA	chuck@telebase.com
And now, on a lighter note:
There is nothing wrong with Southern California that a rise in the
ocean level wouldn't cure.
		-- Ross MacDonald