Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) id NAA26486;
 Fri, 31 May 1996 13:16:20 -0700
Received: from ooo.lanl.gov by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) with ESMTP id
 NAA26477; Fri, 31 May 1996 13:16:16 -0700
Received: by ooo.lanl.gov
	(1.37.109.16/16.2) id AA259803763; Fri, 31 May 1996 14:16:03 -0600
From: Rob Hartill <hartill@ooo.lanl.gov>
Message-Id: <199605312016.AA259803763@ooo.lanl.gov>
Subject: Re: cvs snapshot. compiler warnings
To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com
Date: Fri, 31 May 96 14:16:03 MDT
In-Reply-To: <199605312013.QAA02659@volterra.ai.mit.edu>;
 from "Robert S. Thau" at May 31, 96 4:13 pm
X-Organization: Theoretical Division, T-8. Los Alamos National Laboratory
X-Snail: LANL Theoretical Divi' T-8, MS B285, P.O Box 1663,
 Los Alamos NM 87545
X-Marks-The-Spot: Doh !
X-Url: http://nqcd.lanl.gov/~hartill/
X-Cessive-Use-Of-Headers: check
Mailer: Elm [revision: 70.85]
Sender: owner-new-httpd@apache.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com

 
>   Fix HPUX compiler warning.
> 
> ...and create a compiler warning on other systems which declare the
> arguments for select() more sensibly in their own header files
> (Digital Unix, Solaris, Linux, and Irix at least among the systems
> I have immediately at hand to check).  The only way to nuke this
> warning on all systems is with an #ifdef, and I'm not at all sure
> it's worth it.

I thought the patch did use #ifdef, or am I missing something again?