Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) id PAA21792; Tue, 28 May 1996 15:44:45 -0700 Received: from gw0.telebase.com by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) with ESMTP id PAA21774; Tue, 28 May 1996 15:44:37 -0700 Received: from wormhole.telebase.com by gw0.telebase.com id SAA23654 for ; Tue, 28 May 1996 18:44:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from spudboy.telebase.com (chuck@spudboy.telebase.com [172.16.2.215]) by wormhole.telebase.com (8.7.3/8.6.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA17956 for ; Tue, 28 May 1996 18:44:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from chuck@localhost) by spudboy.telebase.com (8.6.12/8.6.9.1) id SAA12552 for new-httpd@hyperreal.com; Tue, 28 May 1996 18:44:34 -0400 From: Chuck Murcko Message-Id: <199605282244.SAA12552@telebase.com.> Subject: Re: mod_imap fix #2 To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com Date: Tue, 28 May 1996 18:44:33 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: from "Brian Behlendorf" at May 28, 96 03:26:06 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-new-httpd@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com Brian Behlendorf liltingly intones: > > Okay, this should fix the second bug I saw, which was that "default" > entries which were relative links got mis-expanded. This includes my > first fixes as well, so apply this to a mod_imap.c from the cvs tree and > let me know how it goes. > > Is anyone really pounding imagemaps? Nate, could you look over this and > give me your feedback (since the original code was written by you)? Is > there a really good test case or two we can try? > I can try it out on yomama (no, really) and see how it goes. That's a good place to try out the various permutations. Then I can put it out on StonesWorld and see how it goes. My defaults were all absolute, so I didn't see the side effect. chuck Chuck Murcko N2K Inc. Wayne PA chuck@telebase.com And now, on a lighter note: It may be bad manners to talk with your mouth full, but it isn't too good either if you speak when your head is empty.