Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) id IAA23890; Fri, 24 May 1996 08:25:49 -0700 Received: from sierra.zyzzyva.com by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) with ESMTP id IAA23879; Fri, 24 May 1996 08:25:37 -0700 Received: from zyzzyva.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sierra.zyzzyva.com (8.7.5/8.6.11) with ESMTP id KAA26980 for ; Fri, 24 May 1996 10:25:33 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <199605241525.KAA26980@sierra.zyzzyva.com> To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com Subject: Re: Sun's Web Server Performance tests? In-reply-to: rasmus's message of Fri, 24 May 1996 08:58:32 -0400. X-uri: http://www.zyzzyva.com/ Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 24 May 1996 10:25:33 -0500 From: Randy Terbush Sender: owner-new-httpd@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com > > > No no, Zeus is the product name of their Internet-equipped line of > > > UltraSparcs. > > > > Well, if that's the case downloading it should be fun :-) > > > > (Take a look at the above web page, I think you'll find you're wrong). > > Yup, very. Sorry, I shouldn't be trying to think at 1am. > > Doesn't the Zeus server have a bunch of Apache code in it? I browsed > their pages and couldn't see any reference to Apache whatsoever. > > -Rasmus Other than the poor showing that they give us in the benchmarks. They apparently tested an older version since they make the point that Keep-Alives are not supported. I also thought that their largest filesize of 5K that was tested is not representative of the real world. The results seemed to be evening out at 5K.