Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) id OAA08374; Wed, 22 May 1996 14:23:03 -0700 Received: from shado.jaguNET.com by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) with ESMTP id OAA08351; Wed, 22 May 1996 14:22:59 -0700 Received: (from jim@localhost) by shado.jaguNET.com (8.7.5/jag-2.2) id RAA12291 for new-httpd@hyperreal.com; Wed, 22 May 1996 17:23:00 -0400 (EDT) From: Jim Jagielski Message-Id: <199605222123.RAA12291@shado.jaguNET.com> Subject: Re: cvs commit: apache/src http_core.c http_main.c http_main.h http_request.c httpd.h mod_cgi.c mod_status.c scoreboard.h (fwd) To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com Date: Wed, 22 May 1996 17:23:00 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <9605221905.aa07380@gonzo.ben.algroup.co.uk> from "Ben Laurie" at May 22, 96 07:05:43 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-new-httpd@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com Ben Laurie wrote: > > Is this perhaps a little hasty? I'm not sure that this change has had much > chance for review. Besides, it (probably) clashes with my rprintf changes which > I'm also keen to commit ... would someone please check them out, or should I > commit them and see what breaks? Sorry... I thought you're comment about the weird return meant that you had tested 'em out. Doesn't do much else except add another struct element to conn_rec. I had 2 personal +1 Emails as well. -- Jim Jagielski << jim@jaguNET.com >> | "That's a Smith & Wesson, ** jaguNET Access Services ** | and you've had your six" Email: info@jaguNET.com | - James Bond ++ http://www.jaguNET.com/ +++ Voice/Fax: 410-931-3157 ++