Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) id IAA17989;
 Tue, 21 May 1996 08:10:07 -0700
Received: from sierra.zyzzyva.com by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) with
 ESMTP id IAA17981; Tue, 21 May 1996 08:10:01 -0700
Received: from zyzzyva.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sierra.zyzzyva.com
 (8.7.5/8.6.11) with ESMTP id KAA19064 for <new-httpd@hyperreal.com>;
 Tue, 21 May 1996 10:09:59 -0500 (CDT)
Message-Id: <199605211509.KAA19064@sierra.zyzzyva.com>
To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com
Subject: Re: pg95 
In-reply-to: p.richards's message of Tue, 21 May 1996 15:17:57 +0100.
         <199605211417.PAA12050@cadair.elsevier.co.uk>
X-uri: http://www.zyzzyva.com/
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Tue, 21 May 1996 10:09:59 -0500
From: Randy Terbush <randy@zyzzyva.com>
Sender: owner-new-httpd@apache.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com

> Where can I find mod_auth_pg95 ?

http://www.zyzzyva.com/server/module_registry/index.cgi?mod_auth_pg95.amr


> Any reason why this hasn't been accepted?

No real reason. Same goes for the Kerberos authentication module.
This and the mSQL issue really raises the question of whether it
is in our best interest to pull everything offered into core, or
to allow people like Adam Sussman (in the case of mod_auth_pg95)
to continue as the maintainer.