Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) id JAA17548; Fri, 17 May 1996 09:26:25 -0700 Received: from ooo.lanl.gov by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) with ESMTP id JAA17526; Fri, 17 May 1996 09:26:22 -0700 Received: by ooo.lanl.gov (1.37.109.16/16.2) id AA040140367; Fri, 17 May 1996 10:26:07 -0600 From: Rob Hartill Message-Id: <199605171626.AA040140367@ooo.lanl.gov> Subject: Re: The business case for apache To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com Date: Fri, 17 May 96 10:26:07 MDT In-Reply-To: <199605170853.BAA22443@krishna.vidya.com>; from "Adam Sussman" at May 17, 96 1:53 am X-Organization: Theoretical Division, T-8. Los Alamos National Laboratory X-Snail: LANL Theoretical Divi' T-8, MS B285, P.O Box 1663, Los Alamos NM 87545 X-Marks-The-Spot: Doh ! X-Url: http://nqcd.lanl.gov/~hartill/ X-Cessive-Use-Of-Headers: check Mailer: Elm [revision: 70.85] Sender: owner-new-httpd@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com > Here's an illustration of how bad their support can be: > > Way back, almost a year ago, we were installing a copy of commerce > on a sun server. We discovered that the .htaccess files had a > few really unsubtle bugs that made them absolutly unusable and the > only way to enforce any kind of security was to do it through their > fancy web interface. I just downloaded the NT communications server to see if it would behave better than Canon's Apache port (which is broken v0.9.6). I got as far as trying to configure a CGI dir with the forms interface but the backend admin program keeps falling over. So I'm stuck. No sign of anything useful to configure in the dozens of directories created. The configuration procedure is meant to be fool-proof, but they apparently forgot to make it NT-proof. "...Apache config files are good for the soul" Caveat Apache-forms-config-writers. rob -- The rumor is that Jack Kevorkian has setup a Windows-NT users group.