Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) id NAA05968; Thu, 9 May 1996 13:09:51 -0700 Received: from gw0.telebase.com by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) with ESMTP id NAA05959; Thu, 9 May 1996 13:09:44 -0700 Received: from wormhole.telebase.com by gw0.telebase.com id QAA22492 for ; Thu, 9 May 1996 16:09:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from spudboy.telebase.com (chuck@spudboy.telebase.com [172.16.2.215]) by wormhole.telebase.com (8.7.1/8.6.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA07741 for ; Thu, 9 May 1996 16:09:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from chuck@localhost) by spudboy.telebase.com (8.6.12/8.6.9.1) id QAA11075 for new-httpd@hyperreal.com; Thu, 9 May 1996 16:09:41 -0400 From: Chuck Murcko Message-Id: <199605092009.QAA11075@telebase.com.> Subject: Re: possible bug To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com Date: Thu, 9 May 1996 16:09:40 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <199605091934.AA134350489@ooo.lanl.gov> from "Rob Hartill" at May 9, 96 01:34:48 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-new-httpd@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com Rob Hartill liltingly intones: > > > > > http://xxx.lanl.gov/status.html > > > > > > The lack of a #12 is worrying. > > > > > This looks like a server eating its young. #6 looks suspicious, too. > > > > Have you tried a recent (today) snapshot with this patch? and without? > > I just tried the latest cvs snapshot. No problems with that one so far. > I'll see if my reluctant boss is willing to risk it online again. > > Maybe my 1.1b2 had drifted out of sync with the cvs, or was there > something new in the cvs snapshot that might account for it? > Mmmm. Maybe this one of Ben's to buff.[ch]: Buffered file descriptors were not registered for cleanup. This caused an extremely obscure problem with CGI's that disconnect early. Fixed. You and Aram have both had problems against 1.1b2, though. chuck Chuck Murcko N2K Inc. Wayne PA chuck@telebase.com And now, on a lighter note: Take it easy, we're in a hurry.