Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) id IAA06231;
 Thu, 9 May 1996 08:51:41 -0700
Received: from ooo.lanl.gov by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) with ESMTP id
 IAA06218; Thu, 9 May 1996 08:51:38 -0700
Received: by ooo.lanl.gov
	(1.37.109.16/16.2) id AA164277074; Thu, 9 May 1996 09:51:14 -0600
From: Rob Hartill <hartill@ooo.lanl.gov>
Message-Id: <199605091551.AA164277074@ooo.lanl.gov>
Subject: Re: Idea for new Configuration Directive
To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com
Date: Thu, 9 May 96 9:51:13 MDT
In-Reply-To: <ML-2.0.831603755.2583.rasmus@krone.house.mil>;
 from "rasmus@madhaus.utcs.utoronto.ca" at May 8, 96 9:02 pm
X-Organization: Theoretical Division, T-8. Los Alamos National Laboratory
X-Snail: LANL Theoretical Divi' T-8, MS B285, P.O Box 1663,
 Los Alamos NM 87545
X-Marks-The-Spot: Doh !
X-Url: http://nqcd.lanl.gov/~hartill/
X-Cessive-Use-Of-Headers: check
Mailer: Elm [revision: 70.85]
Sender: owner-new-httpd@apache.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com

 
> How is this guarded against in mod_perl?  Will users who write bad Perl
> scripts be able to bloat the httpd data space?

big = bad ?

I set the Berkeley DB config on my perl script to allow 4Mb per db
of cache  :-)


rob