httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Dirk.vanGulik" <>
Subject Re: WWW Form Bug Report: "the check auth function for a module is
Date Tue, 21 May 1996 14:08:49 GMT
As soon as I can reach I;ll stick up a module
which merges the two spellings of directives in both modules; and
it adds the 'no-encryped-passwd' in the database functionality
unique to the current Viteks module as well.

Best I can do I guess. And again; I do *NOT* want to compete.


B.t.w. Who is doing the documentation ? I have it in HTML made by
	a grad here, or should that be tech ?

>> > Since there are several other authentication modules that are
> > not in the standard distribution, I wonder if not including
> > any is an option?  This would not be a reflection on either
> > Vivek or Dirk, but a political move to _not_ extend MFP
> > (Most Favored Programmer) to anyone and level this playing
> > field.
> Not a good idea. You'll confuse the hell out of end-users, as well as
> ourselves by having more than one version of a module with the same name.
> We should have one version of the module in the distribution. Dirk's module
> is already part of the system and there's no reason to change that unless
> he feels that Vivek's provides a better base from which the functionality
> of the two can be merged. Otherwise, Vivek should provide the diffs
> against what we currently have to add the bits he wants.

View raw message