httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chuck Murcko <>
Subject Re: 1.1b3 ?
Date Fri, 17 May 1996 14:56:43 GMT
Paul Richards liltingly intones:
> In reply to Ben Laurie who said
> > 
> > I don't understand why LINGER should be used. According to my man, SO_LINGER
> > causes the close() to block until all data is sent. It should have no effect
> > on the sending of the data. So, what's it all about?
> > 
> I thought that's exactly what the problem was, some buggy SVR4 networking
> code doesn't send data sitting in the kernel part of the networking code if
> the application closes the socket. Setting SO_LINGER would work around
> that bug. This is my understanding from memory though, someone should confirm
> this.
This is indeed the case, at least for UnixWarez.

Chuck Murcko	N2K Inc.	Wayne PA
And now, on a lighter note:
Bugs, pl. n.:
	Small living things that small living boys throw on small
living girls.

View raw message