httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: SIGACTION patch
Date Sat, 11 May 1996 23:11:19 GMT
Ben Laurie wrote:
> 
> Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > 
> > Here's a sigaction patch that should patch cleanly against the current
> > CVS tree. I added a compile define in case some systems don't have or need
> > to use sigaction() over signal():
> 
> I don't understand why my patch didn't patch cleanly ... it was diffed against
> the current tree. Strange.
> 
> Anyway, do I gather from the tenor of these notes that the patch works? (I find
> it slightly surprising since I'd have thought that those platforms that
> supported sigaction would just implement signal in terms of it but I was
> clutching at straws!).
> 

It works here, but then again, signal() worked as well.
-- 
Jim Jagielski  << jim@jaguNET.com >>   |      "That's a Smith & Wesson,
  **  jaguNET Access Services  **      |       and you've had your six" 
      Email: info@jaguNET.com          |             - James Bond
++    http://www.jaguNET.com/         +++      Voice/Fax: 410-931-3157       ++

Mime
View raw message