httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: sigaction tryout patches
Date Sat, 11 May 1996 00:34:42 GMT
Chuck Murcko wrote:
> 
> Rob Hartill liltingly intones:
> > 
> >  
> > > OK, I have no idea whether this will help or not, but here's a patch to use
> > > sigaction() instead of signal(). It seems to work for me but does it cure the
> > > non-dying children problem? I don't know!
> > 
> > It compiles on HPUX and responds correctly to -1,-15
> > 
> > I can now start a new server immediately after doing a kill -15 which
> > is a promising sign.
> > 
> Same here on BSDI and IRIX, so far. I won't have a chance to really beat
> on it until late tonight, though. I'll try an old UnixWare build then too.
> 
> Update:
> UnixWare is running fine, and works great with this patch. I'll package a
> test source set for some UnixWare 2.x people to try. I'll preconfigure it
> and leave it version alone. I figure to get reports from two test sites.
> 
> IRIX and BSDI have held up to everything I can do to break them wrt this
> change.
> 
> That leaves, what, everything else? Solaris, SunOS, Linux, FreeBSD, etc. etc.
> 

Haven't tried it yet under A/UX, basically because, for some reason,
the patch won't patch, meaning I need to hand-patch it, and I'm a bit
lazy right now :)

-- 
Jim Jagielski  << jim@jaguNET.com >>   |      "That's a Smith & Wesson,
  **  jaguNET Access Services  **      |       and you've had your six" 
      Email: info@jaguNET.com          |             - James Bond
++    http://www.jaguNET.com/         +++      Voice/Fax: 410-931-3157       ++

Mime
View raw message