Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) id TAA17670; Mon, 8 Apr 1996 19:26:14 -0700 Received: from newshare.newshare.com by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) with ESMTP id TAA17665; Mon, 8 Apr 1996 19:26:11 -0700 Received: (from dave@localhost) by newshare.newshare.com (8.7.3/8.6.9) id WAA00201; Mon, 8 Apr 1996 22:26:06 -0400 Date: Mon, 8 Apr 1996 22:26:05 -0400 (EDT) From: "David M. Oliver" To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com Subject: Re: URL question In-Reply-To: <199604081410.KAA00418@luers.qosina.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-new-httpd@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com Status: O X-Status: On Mon, 8 Apr 1996, Aram Mirzadeh wrote: > Can anyone shed any light on this? I didn't even think this was legal > if you go by rfcs. > > > >href="http://www.hungary.com/+/__ref_hudir_e_net/http://hix.mit.edu/narancs/ > >7_31/helyek.html#Balatonfo2ldva1r">Balatonföldvár looks like a way to do "referer" without a referer header, eh? hungary.com is in the same domain as narancs.hu.net, which is hte redirect you get when you try this URL. dmo +------------------------------------------------------------------+ | David Oliver dave@clickshare.com | | President & Managing Director-Technology Clickshare Corporation | +------------------------------------------------------------------+