Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) id SAA23081; Tue, 23 Apr 1996 18:36:14 -0700 Received: from luers.qosina.com by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) with ESMTP id SAA23075; Tue, 23 Apr 1996 18:36:11 -0700 Received: (from awm@localhost) by luers.qosina.com (8.7.1/8.7.1) id VAA27163 for new-httpd@hyperreal.com; Tue, 23 Apr 1996 21:36:17 -0400 From: Aram Mirzadeh Message-Id: <199604240136.VAA27163@luers.qosina.com> Subject: Re: 1.1b2 To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com Date: Tue, 23 Apr 1996 21:36:16 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <9604232212.AA4791@main.slink.com> from "Garey Smiley" at Apr 23, 96 06:12:16 pm Content-Type: text Sender: owner-new-httpd@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com > >Sounds like we're all in agreement about cgi-src/cgi-bin - perhaps this > >distribution can be the first without it? > > -1 > > Let clean out the fluff, but keep some of the basic scripts. jj.c and > phf.c should definately get nuked. Things like test-cgi and query.c > should stay. I think they can be used as basic diagnose tools by the > webmaster for a new setup. What are the thoughts on change-passwd.c and > the other scripts? I completely agree, most of the new "webmasters" just run apache, and first they do is run netscape on the same machine to see if apache is working... And I get questions like, "apache must be broken, netscape took 5 minutes to load my 8 mb machine...". What I usually tell them is that they can just telnet localhost 80 and do a get for /cgi-bin/test-cgi to see if everything is working.. that's I belive the easiest way to see what you have, and what's working. -- /* * Aram Mirzadeh, MIS Manager, Qosina Corp. http://www.qosina.com/~awm/ * Apache Development Team, awm@hyperreal.com http://www.hyperreal.com/ * * "Prizes are for children." -- Chrales Ives, upon being given, but refusing, * the Pulitzer prize */